I realized that 'priest' is too popular because 'priests' are not like 'space aliens'. They are not twinkling lights in the sky. They're Real. So another term is needed. Like "space" & "alien".
I tried "Priest" squared which gave somewhat more than the number of accusers.
I tried "Clergy" Squared which gave somewhat less.
And I tried "Priest" times "Clergy" which gave about 20% more..
Then I found "Catholic Priest" Both an idea and a person.
"Catholic priest" showed a popularity of .0000012 for pre internet 1995, the lowest popularity since 1950.)
Comparing "alien abduction" (accusations)
to "catholic priest" (accusations),
(based on word popularity), gave;
1,700 divided by .000002 times .0000012 = 1020 (predicted)
This matched also. Catholic priests showed 1021 police reports. An error less than 1/10th percent.
We simply don't know how many priests might be abusers. (and how many are abused)
And we can't be sure why "space aliens" are also exactly 2/3 more hostile than priests.
(1,700/1,021) = 1.665 )
Why are twinkling lights in the sky 66% more hostile than priests? Maybe its easier to accuse an 'idea' than a person. (Or, if you like the new google numbers, then why are priests getting fewer than half the expected false accusations?)
That Ngram number now shows .000002385 which predicts twice as many false accusations as priests actually get. Priests now have half as many police reports as expected. So priests are now 1/2th as 'abusive' as 'space aliens'. They are very nice people with high public exposure. However the original data did predict 1020 accusations vs the actual 1021 police reports. The new number predicts 2027 police reports.(slightly more than twice as many as occurred). It appears to have been rigged to bolster media attacks on priests and to discredit the research and author.
The Larry Nassar case has some numbers worth noting.
Here a doctor was paid to grab patients butts to adjust their back.
Early on the girls laughed among themselves how they hated having that done.
And joked about the doctor. 15 years later they made the teen joking appear real.
"Nasser" (with an 'e') has a word frequency of about .0000006 in American English (2008 google ngram changed to .0000003 but the median probability of that term is still about .000006). (It is more popular than Nassar with an 'a', but is spoken the same way.) This predicts 510 (alien abduction) accusers. A recent report showed only 333 accusers. (the average word popularity since 1960 of .0000004 predicts 340 false accusers).
As a christian, it makes me wonder why god allows false charges. For instance half of death row was shown to be innocent when DNA testing became available.(statistics also became hard to find after 2008) The Nassar case is similar again in that there was no problem, in fact they paid him for the work, then suddenly in 2014 someone made a complaint and a large mob formed with 333 people suing Michigan State University for a HALF BILLION DOLLARS.
Enough to make anyone want to turn their head and cough.
The Numbers suggest all these cases are the result of vicious mobs of slanderers who appeared out of nowhere. Like the porn on Nassar's computer which seems to have appeared out of nowhere. 37,000 images of kiddy porn. At 2 hours a day, that would take a year to download at a minute per image. About the amount of time between the first accusation in 2014 and the sudden investigation for kiddy porn a year later.
Did he buy the porn on the internet? Is there a secret "free kiddy porn network"?
Or was it donated by a well meaning "family protector"?
All the numbers say innocent. All of them.
All the accusers say Give us money. All of them.
A recent case arose where famous singer R Kelly was charged. Analysis of his word popularity
shows "R" as .0035 and Kelly .000005 Multiplying these together gives R*Kelly = .0000000245
1700 divided by .000002 times .0000000245 = 20.8 Accusers.
The Numbers predict 20 accusers. I do not know how many witnesses will testify against him.
But again, It looks like popularity is causing people to report space aliens and other famous
Here we go again:
well obviously nobody is permitted to argue that Epstine is innocent. And peer pressure is a bad sign.
So lets look at the numbers.
Jeffrey Epstine was totally unknown. Jeffrey Who?, is all anyone on the street would know. But he was a billionaire playboy. That's what islands and parties are. Just play, when the work is done. (presumably by brokers and lawyers).
Billionaire has a word frequency of about .000035 and playboy also has about .000048
Not surprizingly, "Billionaire times Playboy" gives;
1700 divided by .000002 times .000035 times .000048 = 1.4 Accusers.
(by all media resports) This is what Epstine had.
He had one 'alien abduction' story (using lawyer induced words). Nobody says I was trafficked. Thats lawyer words not victim words.
"just a story".
And this is what he had.
One alien abduction story.(for money, with lawyer induced verbal constructions)
And one copycat lawsuit.(for money, with same lawyer induced constructions)
The facts are undeniable. The math is real.
Aliens are not abducting people (and then letting them go).
Instead, famous people are simply being attacked, at the same rate as the alien "twinkle lights in the sky".
The data for "Cosby", "Hollywood/2Pi", "Nasser" and "Catholic Priests" AND Jeffrey Epstine appears to confirm The Alien Abduction effect.
False charges are a Fact. They are serious threat to the united states. There is no presumption of innocence. They lock you up right away. Then, they bribe you to confess to lesser charges. For saftey. This happened to Epstine.
I know that false accusations are a problem in America. But words seem useless, so i give you the numbers.
The math I present here is not difficult. But we know from DNA that our justice system is troubled. I hope others can help. Jesus tells us to love our enemies, forgive them and do good to them. But everywhere people are out of control. People jam my search listings, cheat my web, email and paypal. They pirate my patent (and copyright). They monopolize and destroy.
They gave Larry Nassar 60 years in jail for "possessing photos". A death sentence.
If the family dog tries to hump your leg you don't sue the parents for a million dollars. You wouldn't put a dog in jail for 60 years. Even if it were true. But it's not true because there is no truth left. Search the term "vape", do you see TheUbie.Com?
* In fact Cosby was convicted because he truthfully admitted to once trying a qualude (in the 70s). An innocuous trivia. But enough to confuse starry-eyed dreamers.
So (if you ever smoked a joint.) Then "AH HAH!" You were working with Manuel Noryega's Drug Cult!! Unfortunatly that was the clear reasoning process of what we call justice. So they put an elderly Blind Man in jail. Because Daydreams.